It is deeply saddening’: how 30 confined beluga whales are now tools in conflict over animal cruelty.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable little “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, local and national governments and animal rights activists.
But those most familiar with the whales say the heated debate over their destiny often ignores the nuances of the whales who, after growing up in captivity, have been carefully observed by the humans who work with them regularly.
After the federal government disallowed the transfer of the belugas to China, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are housed threatened to euthanize them unless the federal government funds the cost of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable position.
Intelligent Marine Mammals
Experts say that beluga whales’ neuroanatomy, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are remarkably smart animals – something one caretaker observed directly.
She spent a significant period as a marine mammal specialist, a job that required building relationships of the aquatic animals.
“Developing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”
The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the subtleties and quirks in their personalities. She cultivated a deep bond for a pair of whales with different temperaments.
“One whale selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each changed the way I understand relationships.”
Public Concerns and Facility Decline
Her relationship with the whales evolved against a context of increasing societal concern to their captivity.
During her tenure at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single orca, Kiska, succumbed. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the facility ascribes to expected lifespan, but which advocates say points to the substandard environment in which they were kept.
The facility did not operate to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes results of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they pick it up and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”
The facility did not respond to a request for comment, but previously asserted: “The whales … obtain far higher quality veterinary services and constant care than any individual in the UK, or other places.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was terminated from the facility in early March following the death of Eos, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to humanely kill. She said the park suspected particulars of the death were disclosed to the media and she was let go soon after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and current and former trainers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “immense personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.
“There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess backs demands for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its failing enclosures and shrinking team.
In late September, the nation’s government official denied a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.
“Granting the application would have meant a continued situation in enclosure and a return to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As society, we know that whales belong in the ocean, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the official’s statements indicate a wider misunderstanding of the facts of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.
“The public needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as easy as saying ‘end operations’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion
As officials work to find a resolution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of food for local populations.
A suggested sanctuary in the province of Nova Scotia, which now received government approval, has shown to be highly debated. The prospective facility, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain optimistic that it could in time represent a sustainable answer for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s spoken with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ future.
Some experts say the idea of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable plan in the coming months.
Charles Vinick, director of the initiative, said the location will mimic the mental engagement and feeding regimen the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the health of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|